AFP, Hashtag fail? #BringBackOurGirls two years on, 13 Apr 2016 "On the ground, 219 of the 276 girls are still missing, their Government Girls Secondary School is a broken ruin and Chibok is desperate for development."
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Thursday, 14 April 2016
Tuesday, 8 March 2016
Twitter praised for cracking down on use by Islamic State
Reuters/CNBC, Twitter praised for cracking down on use by Islamic State, 8 Mar 2016 "Officials with the nonprofit Simon Wiesenthal Center praised Twitter on Monday for increasing efforts to thwart Islamic State's use of its platform for recruitment and propaganda."
Thursday, 25 February 2016
Isis video targets Twitter and Facebook CEOs over suspended accounts
Guardian, Isis video targets Twitter and Facebook CEOs over suspended accounts, 23 Feb 2016 "Islamic State has released a 25-minute video featuring the faces of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg being riddled with mock bullet holes."
Monday, 1 February 2016
Tareena Shakil
BBC News, Tareena Shakil jailed for six years for joining IS, 1 Feb 2016 "Shakil, a former health worker from Birmingham, but formerly of Burton-upon-Trent in Staffordshire, admitted travelling to Syria but denied joining IS and encouraging acts of terrorism through messages posted on Twitter."
Friday, 15 January 2016
Twitter under pressure??
The Economic Times, Twitter sued by US widow for giving voice to Islamic State, 15 Jan 2016 " Twitter Inc is being sued by the widow of an American killed in Jordan who accuses the social media company of giving a voice to Islamic State, adding to the pressure to crack down on online propaganda linked to terrorism."
Monday, 30 November 2015
Now it's ghettoisation on social media too: Hindu, Muslim ghettos on Facebook, Twitter
This post is about a trend I have noticed over the years--how people change drastically on social media.
Over a period of time, they create their own 'ghettoes' on the internet, avoid opposing views and end up isolating themselves from rest of the world.
Now there is nothing wrong about interacting with the like-minded but here it is not about people who share interest in tennis, gardening or literature.
Rather, it is about how people choose to interact with those who share similar ideology, then over a period of time their positions get hardened, they get more drawn towards those people, until they create their dream world--of all those who share their ideology.
There was a nice guy who was active on Twitter. In the initial years, he was friendly with people of all sections but then everybody felt he was getting irrational on certain issues. Ideology now prevailed over sane thoughts.
Now, he doesn't fight with the oldies but simply avoids the few of them, he still follows. Most of the time, he is busy fighting the 'Rest', leading an army of Twitter-walas of same ideology, who launch mercilessly attacks on those with diverse opinions, in order to create a world of their own liking.
It is not just about Hindus and Muslims, it is also about left-wing and right-wing, the 'sickulars' and the 'bhakts'. I have seen this affect their personality. This delusion that they have already created their utopian world on internet and are on way towards changing the world, reflects in their real life too.
Just see how these ghettos come up on social media, graduating from one level to another, until you are in the Ghetto.
1. A 'like' or 'Retweet' is an incentive on social media. Criticism is unwelcome, those who criticise aren't good guys, are they!
2. Even for irrational thoughts, there must be 'likes' and those who argue or question, aren't 'my friends'. So just ignore, avoid, block or unfriend the critics--just be in your comfort zone. [There is also the 'mute' button now on Twitter, so you don't un-follow them but their voice won't reach you]
3. Side with those who think like you. The are the real friends (even if many of them you never met on the street & they don't have real photos either]
4. You will like their post, they will promptly like yours, after all, you share the same 'great ideals'.
5. You are happy with those who 'like' your post, you drift towards them even more, get into that world.
6. On Twitter too, you un-follow those whose opinions are not in sync with your beliefs, except may be a few old friends.
7. You get heady feeling with more likes and RTs by those who think alike, you keep getting
immersed in your ideology--sectarian, communal, your positions get hardened day by day.
8. So now you are getting the dose which you want, any criticism, diverse thoughts or opposing idea are unwelcome and in any case these 'uncomfortable or irritating people' are not even reaching you now. You have blocked or ignored or filtered them by now.
9. 'Those others' in your friend list or followers list are just tolerated, and you simply wish them on birthdays, anniversaries.
10. Of course you are talking publicly and you are on social media, but it is just like a caste-linguistic-religious ghetto where you are happy with your own kind, no diversity.
Now, you are in your dream world.
PS: Just check self, if you are into this ghettoisation, too? (everyone, including this blogger, must introspect)
[For those whom I observed, more on Twitter, going up in indoctrination levels within a few years]
Over a period of time, they create their own 'ghettoes' on the internet, avoid opposing views and end up isolating themselves from rest of the world.
Now there is nothing wrong about interacting with the like-minded but here it is not about people who share interest in tennis, gardening or literature.
Rather, it is about how people choose to interact with those who share similar ideology, then over a period of time their positions get hardened, they get more drawn towards those people, until they create their dream world--of all those who share their ideology.
There was a nice guy who was active on Twitter. In the initial years, he was friendly with people of all sections but then everybody felt he was getting irrational on certain issues. Ideology now prevailed over sane thoughts.
Now, he doesn't fight with the oldies but simply avoids the few of them, he still follows. Most of the time, he is busy fighting the 'Rest', leading an army of Twitter-walas of same ideology, who launch mercilessly attacks on those with diverse opinions, in order to create a world of their own liking.
It is not just about Hindus and Muslims, it is also about left-wing and right-wing, the 'sickulars' and the 'bhakts'. I have seen this affect their personality. This delusion that they have already created their utopian world on internet and are on way towards changing the world, reflects in their real life too.
Just see how these ghettos come up on social media, graduating from one level to another, until you are in the Ghetto.
1. A 'like' or 'Retweet' is an incentive on social media. Criticism is unwelcome, those who criticise aren't good guys, are they!
2. Even for irrational thoughts, there must be 'likes' and those who argue or question, aren't 'my friends'. So just ignore, avoid, block or unfriend the critics--just be in your comfort zone. [There is also the 'mute' button now on Twitter, so you don't un-follow them but their voice won't reach you]
3. Side with those who think like you. The are the real friends (even if many of them you never met on the street & they don't have real photos either]
4. You will like their post, they will promptly like yours, after all, you share the same 'great ideals'.
5. You are happy with those who 'like' your post, you drift towards them even more, get into that world.
6. On Twitter too, you un-follow those whose opinions are not in sync with your beliefs, except may be a few old friends.
7. You get heady feeling with more likes and RTs by those who think alike, you keep getting
immersed in your ideology--sectarian, communal, your positions get hardened day by day.
8. So now you are getting the dose which you want, any criticism, diverse thoughts or opposing idea are unwelcome and in any case these 'uncomfortable or irritating people' are not even reaching you now. You have blocked or ignored or filtered them by now.
9. 'Those others' in your friend list or followers list are just tolerated, and you simply wish them on birthdays, anniversaries.
10. Of course you are talking publicly and you are on social media, but it is just like a caste-linguistic-religious ghetto where you are happy with your own kind, no diversity.
Now, you are in your dream world.
PS: Just check self, if you are into this ghettoisation, too? (everyone, including this blogger, must introspect)
[For those whom I observed, more on Twitter, going up in indoctrination levels within a few years]
Thursday, 29 October 2015
Pay to get more Facebook 'likes', more 'followers' on Twitter: Unfair practices on social media?
Social media giants Facebook & Twitter have lately come up with similar plans for users who want 'greater clout' or 'more audience'.
If you pay money, you have the option to get more Facebook 'likes' and more Twitter 'followers'.
But is it fair? Content is not the king anymore.
Someone who has extra dollars or rupees, to spend, can use it for branding and get thousands of 'real or unreal' followers on Twitter.
Similar is the case with Facebook. Here, a person can 'buy' the 'likes' for his/her page. Where's the level-playing field on social media?
That's the fundamental question.
I don't feel it is fair. These companies initially had no such schemes but once they reached a level where they are opinion makers and dominate our lives, they have come up with these schemes.
Personally, I don't like it. It's like, you can't earn numbers or grades, so just pay for it. Is it fair?
Take for example, movie personalities, TV persons, sport stars or anybody who came late on these platforms, and have less followers.
Or those who don't have anything interesting to share but feel upset that others have more likes or followers, can avail these schemes.
They can just pay money and get past the people who genuinely earned the following.
If you pay, Twitter shows your profile to many more people as 'suggested' in 'Who to Follow' advisory on the top right.
If you pay, your page is displayed to more people who are suggested by Facebook, to like the page.
On Facebook, you get option to target people in particular region or people of a particular age group.
We like it or not, Facebook and Twitter dominate our lives so much, that we have to live with it--their policies. They are here for business, aren't they. And that's what business is!!!
If you pay money, you have the option to get more Facebook 'likes' and more Twitter 'followers'.
But is it fair? Content is not the king anymore.
Someone who has extra dollars or rupees, to spend, can use it for branding and get thousands of 'real or unreal' followers on Twitter.
Similar is the case with Facebook. Here, a person can 'buy' the 'likes' for his/her page. Where's the level-playing field on social media?
That's the fundamental question.
I don't feel it is fair. These companies initially had no such schemes but once they reached a level where they are opinion makers and dominate our lives, they have come up with these schemes.
Personally, I don't like it. It's like, you can't earn numbers or grades, so just pay for it. Is it fair?
Take for example, movie personalities, TV persons, sport stars or anybody who came late on these platforms, and have less followers.
Or those who don't have anything interesting to share but feel upset that others have more likes or followers, can avail these schemes.
They can just pay money and get past the people who genuinely earned the following.
If you pay, Twitter shows your profile to many more people as 'suggested' in 'Who to Follow' advisory on the top right.
If you pay, your page is displayed to more people who are suggested by Facebook, to like the page.
On Facebook, you get option to target people in particular region or people of a particular age group.
We like it or not, Facebook and Twitter dominate our lives so much, that we have to live with it--their policies. They are here for business, aren't they. And that's what business is!!!
Sunday, 15 February 2015
Big B, Khans ahead of Narendra Modi on Twitter: Bollywood beats cricket stars in list of Indian celebrities with most followers; Sachin Tendulkar left far behind
Who is the most popular Indian on Twitter? Big B, Amitabh Bachchan, has 13.2 million followers.
Bachchan was active on Twitter long before other celebrities took to it.
Second is Shahrukh Khan, the Badshah of Bollywood, with over 11.4 million or 1.14 crore people following him on this micro-blogging site.
Surprisingly, Aamir Khan comes after him with 11.2 million or 1.12 crore people following him. 'Dabangg' Salman Khan is fourth with 10.6 million or 1.06 crore people following him.
But PM Narendra Modi is giving them a tough competition. The Prime Minister of India has over 10 million followers (10.1) too, and this makes him a rare politician in Asia with such a huge number of followers on this social media platform.
Modi has more than 0.1 million followers now. The difference of one digit may seem less but there is still a difference of 3 million or 30 lakh with Big B and over 1 million or 10-14 lakh followers between him and King Khan.
In fact, earlier it was reported that Modi was second only to Barack Obama among politicians in terms of popularity on Twitter. India's huge population is definitely an asset for its movie personalities as well as its politicians.
Deepika Padukone, Priyanka Chopra are also knocking at the door of the crore-pati [10 million followers] club on Twitter. Deepika has 9.5 lakh followers while Priyanka Chopra has 8.79 lakh. Then comes Hrithik Roshan [8.5 lakh]. Akshay Kumar is also in the line with 7.5 lakh people following him.
Tendulkar is not a crore-pati on Twitter yet: Bollywood beats God of Indian cricket
The general perception is that two things Indians love most is Bollywood and Cricket. But here, cricket seems to be lagging. The 'God' of Indian cricket, Sachin Tendulkar has 5.07 million or over 50 lakh followers. Not a crore-pati on Twitter yet. Even Karan Johar has more followers that him.
The exception is Virat Kohli, who has quickly reached 5.5 million. Given his popularity and that he is in full flow, he is likely to give a tough competition to other celebrities on the social media site.
Dhoni has 3.5 million or 35 lakh followers. My hero of yesteryear Sunil Gavaskar has less than 50,000 followers. Can there be anything more saddening? We all know that on Twitter, many inactive tweeple follow their celebrities, even if the latter rarely tweet.
But given the huge difference in following, it seems, cricket maniacs are less in number now. The movie stars are far ahead. Among politicians, once, Shashi Tharoor, was far ahead in popularity. But now, he is far behind, with 2.78 million or 27.8 lakh followers. Digvijaya Singh is close with over 25 lakh followers.
Twitter: The handles of these celebrities are mentioned below
List of the TOP TEN Indians on TWITTER
Celebrities Twitter handle Number of followers
Amitabh Bachchan @SrBachchan 13.2 million [1.32 crore]
Shahrukh Khan @iamsrk 11.4 million [1.14 crore]
Aamir Khan @aamir_khan 11.2 million [1.12 crore]
Salman Khan @BeingSalmanKhan 10.6 million [1.06 crore]
Narendra Modi @narendramodi 10.1 million [1.01 crore]
Deepika Padukone @deepikapadukone 9.5 million [95 lakh]
Priyanka Chopra @priyankachopra 8.79 million [87 lakh]
Hrithik Roshan @ihrithik 8.51 million [85 lakh]
Askhay Kumar @akshaykumar 7.54 million [75.4 lakh]
Karan Johar @karanjohar 5.6 million [56 lakh]
....................................................
....................................................
Virat Kohli @iamvkohli 5.5 million [55 lakh]
Sachin Tendulkar @sachin_rt 5.07 million [50.7 lakh]
.....................................................
.....................................................
Arvind Kejriwal @arvindkejriwal 3.63 lakh
Dilip Kumar @TheDilipKumar 3.36 lakh
MS Dhoni @msdhoni 3.52 lakh
The leaders are mostly movie stars, politicians or, yes, some cricketers. The rabble-rousing politicians (the names which may come to your mind) have followers in thousands only.
[Just the most popular personalities with highest following on Twitter have been mentioned. Not all celebrities have been mentioned here. The statistics are till February 15, 2015]
Bachchan was active on Twitter long before other celebrities took to it.
Second is Shahrukh Khan, the Badshah of Bollywood, with over 11.4 million or 1.14 crore people following him on this micro-blogging site.
Surprisingly, Aamir Khan comes after him with 11.2 million or 1.12 crore people following him. 'Dabangg' Salman Khan is fourth with 10.6 million or 1.06 crore people following him.
But PM Narendra Modi is giving them a tough competition. The Prime Minister of India has over 10 million followers (10.1) too, and this makes him a rare politician in Asia with such a huge number of followers on this social media platform.
Modi has more than 0.1 million followers now. The difference of one digit may seem less but there is still a difference of 3 million or 30 lakh with Big B and over 1 million or 10-14 lakh followers between him and King Khan.
In fact, earlier it was reported that Modi was second only to Barack Obama among politicians in terms of popularity on Twitter. India's huge population is definitely an asset for its movie personalities as well as its politicians.
Deepika Padukone, Priyanka Chopra are also knocking at the door of the crore-pati [10 million followers] club on Twitter. Deepika has 9.5 lakh followers while Priyanka Chopra has 8.79 lakh. Then comes Hrithik Roshan [8.5 lakh]. Akshay Kumar is also in the line with 7.5 lakh people following him.
Tendulkar is not a crore-pati on Twitter yet: Bollywood beats God of Indian cricket
The general perception is that two things Indians love most is Bollywood and Cricket. But here, cricket seems to be lagging. The 'God' of Indian cricket, Sachin Tendulkar has 5.07 million or over 50 lakh followers. Not a crore-pati on Twitter yet. Even Karan Johar has more followers that him.
The exception is Virat Kohli, who has quickly reached 5.5 million. Given his popularity and that he is in full flow, he is likely to give a tough competition to other celebrities on the social media site.
Dhoni has 3.5 million or 35 lakh followers. My hero of yesteryear Sunil Gavaskar has less than 50,000 followers. Can there be anything more saddening? We all know that on Twitter, many inactive tweeple follow their celebrities, even if the latter rarely tweet.
But given the huge difference in following, it seems, cricket maniacs are less in number now. The movie stars are far ahead. Among politicians, once, Shashi Tharoor, was far ahead in popularity. But now, he is far behind, with 2.78 million or 27.8 lakh followers. Digvijaya Singh is close with over 25 lakh followers.
Twitter: The handles of these celebrities are mentioned below
List of the TOP TEN Indians on TWITTER
Celebrities Twitter handle Number of followers
Amitabh Bachchan @SrBachchan 13.2 million [1.32 crore]
Shahrukh Khan @iamsrk 11.4 million [1.14 crore]
Aamir Khan @aamir_khan 11.2 million [1.12 crore]
Salman Khan @BeingSalmanKhan 10.6 million [1.06 crore]
Narendra Modi @narendramodi 10.1 million [1.01 crore]
Deepika Padukone @deepikapadukone 9.5 million [95 lakh]
Priyanka Chopra @priyankachopra 8.79 million [87 lakh]
Hrithik Roshan @ihrithik 8.51 million [85 lakh]
Askhay Kumar @akshaykumar 7.54 million [75.4 lakh]
Karan Johar @karanjohar 5.6 million [56 lakh]
....................................................
....................................................
Virat Kohli @iamvkohli 5.5 million [55 lakh]
Sachin Tendulkar @sachin_rt 5.07 million [50.7 lakh]
.....................................................
.....................................................
Arvind Kejriwal @arvindkejriwal 3.63 lakh
Dilip Kumar @TheDilipKumar 3.36 lakh
MS Dhoni @msdhoni 3.52 lakh
The leaders are mostly movie stars, politicians or, yes, some cricketers. The rabble-rousing politicians (the names which may come to your mind) have followers in thousands only.
[Just the most popular personalities with highest following on Twitter have been mentioned. Not all celebrities have been mentioned here. The statistics are till February 15, 2015]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



